← All work
Biometric Admissions·Native tablet · hardware-aware trust workflow

I had to make palm capture work across a person, a tablet, the biometric system, and an unreliable network.

I designed a tablet-based admissions direction for palm enrollment and matching, including capture guidance, success, failure, retry, QR/PIN handoff, device handling, and offline constraints.

Biometric Admissions tablet startup, candidate finder, and candidate information states
Hero proof · Prototype and interaction-design evidence
// RoleProduct Designer · native interaction
// AudienceTest administrators · candidates
// TeamProduct · engineering · hardware vendor · field staff
// TimeframeTechnical direction + in-person usability
// MaturityPrototype and interaction-design evidence
// SignalPilot approved as next gate · not completed
// Three product decisionsInterface first

Three decisions shaped the palm-capture flow.

Guide repeatable biometric capture and recovery across hardware, identity, local server, cloud, and network constraints.

Biometric admissions startup, candidate, and capture sequence
Identity · confirm the candidate before capture.
Decision 01

Keep the candidate record visible before capture.

Administrators confirm the right person and test context before entering a biometric state that can be difficult to reverse.

Biometric palm positioning guidance on tablet
Capture · positioning feedback near the device.
Decision 02

Turn positioning into visible progress.

Live guidance explains palm placement and capture quality so administrators can correct technique instead of guessing why the device has not advanced.

Biometric palm-capture success and failure states
Recover · specific failure before another attempt.
Decision 03

Design failure as a recoverable state.

The interface distinguishes capture failure, device or configuration problems, retry, and alternate handoff so the administrator knows what can be fixed at the station.

// UI evidenceAdditional product evidence

More of the palm-capture flow

A continuous capture sequence showing guidance, acquisition, validation, and recovery states.

Product walkthrough
Legacy palm biometric device interaction
Earlier palm biometric device baseline
Biometric admissions interaction in a test-center context
Prototype evidence · bounded maturity
Evidence and outcome

Field research changed the physical setup as well as the UI.

In-person testing showed that tablet placement, training, and capture technique affected success as much as screen wording. The work supports a technical design and prototype direction.

// ReflectionLimits and next questions

The pilot still had to prove the physical setup.

Tradeoff

Tradeoff

More guidance can slow an experienced administrator.

Limitation

Evidence boundary

The next pilot was approved, but a completed pilot and production performance are not claimed.

Next step

Next test

Validate the end-to-end flow with production-like hardware, offline handling, and repeat capture conditions.

// Protected deep caseDecisions · evidence · edge cases

See the evidence behind the decisions.

Includes the role breakdown, evidence, edge cases, outcomes, and lessons.

// Talk about a complex product

Get in touch